Top 10 Indie Characters Who Won Our Hearts Despite Being Terrible People
From Baby Steps' Nate to other awkward antiheroes, our 2026 list celebrates indie protagonists who are messy, cringey — and unforgettable.
Hook: Why we keep rooting for terrible people in indie games
Finding standout indie releases in 2026 is harder than ever — the indie scene exploded through late 2025 with dozens of narrative-first titles vying for attention. Players tell us they want memorable protagonists, but often they don’t want someone polished or heroic; they want characters who feel messy, human and reliably awkward. That’s where Baby Steps’ Nate lives, and why this list matters: we’re celebrating indie characters who are objectively awful people (or at least deeply flawed) but somehow became player favourites.
The thesis — why flawed protagonists win
Before the list: a quick thesis. The most beloved antiheroes in indie games resonate because they skew toward authenticity over idealism. They’re written with clear flaws, they make bad decisions (and often apologise badly), and they let players witness growth, humiliation and occasional triumph. In a streaming-first, community-driven 2026, those characters fuel memes, speedruns, and live narrative events — all of which boost discoverability and long-term community engagement.
“It’s a loving mockery, because it’s also who I am.” — The makers of Baby Steps on designing Nate
How to read this list
This is a light listicle and a small character study. Each entry includes a quick portrait, why the character irritates yet enthrals players, and a note on how communities and events turned them into staples of indie culture. If you’re a player, streamer, or indie dev, look out for the actionable takeaways after the list.
Top 10 indie characters who won our hearts despite being terrible people
1. Nate (Baby Steps)
Portrait: A grumbling, underprepared man in a onesie with a russet beard and a knack for embarrassing self-sabotage. Nate’s journey up a mountain is more therapy session than adventure — he moans, urinates shyly, and keeps making choices that would make listeners on a group hike lose faith.
Why he resonates: Nate is a mirror. Players recognise the petty anxieties and social ineptitude he embodies, and the game’s comedic framing turns disgust into affection. Late-2025 reviews called him “gaming’s most pathetic character” — not as an insult but as an achievement in authenticity.
Community impact: Streams of speed-climb attempts and “Nate fails” compilations exploded across UK creators after Baby Steps’ festival run in late 2025. At conventions in 2026, Nate’s onesie became a popular, low-effort cosplay — perfect for community photo ops and panels.
2. The Narrator of We Don’t Care
Portrait: A snide, unreliable storyteller who constantly undermines player choices and complains about the audience’s taste.
Why they resonate: The Narrator lampshades the player’s control issues and ego. Players love to rebel against them — and the meta-commentary fuels stream jokes and narrated speedruns.
Community impact: Interactive live shows and Discord-written “Narrator roast nights” became a thing in early 2026, where players edited narrated clips for maximum shade.
3. Margo (Off-Grid Wife)
Portrait: A manipulative ex who rewrites history and gaslights other characters for emotional advantage.
Why she resonates: Her blunt immorality is narratively interesting; her decisions force players to confront the messy aftermath of small betrayals. She’s the kind of antagonist who makes you replay scenes to catch details you missed.
Community impact: Narrative analysts on YouTube produced deep dives into Margo’s dialogue trees, which helped the game’s longevity and discussion threads at UK indie meetups.
4. Ernie (Dumpster Sundays)
Portrait: A petty, entitled grifter who hoards other people’s trash and claims philosophy from the street corner.
Why he resonates: Ernie’s selfish charm and comic timing make social play sessions entertaining. Players pick his lines to provoke NPCs and other players.
Community impact: Speedrunning communities developed “Ernie Challenge” runs — completing objectives while being mean to everyone — turning toxicity into performative fun under controlled rules.
5. The Shopkeeper (Curio Shack)
Portrait: A shrewd merchant who delights in gouging and moralising at checkout, then gives cryptic life advice for extra coin.
Why they resonate: Small power plays are relatable; the Shopkeeper’s petty evil is comforting because it’s consistent and profitable for the game’s economy mechanics.
Community impact: Indie market stall re-creations at events and micro-merch swaps featuring the Shopkeeper’s snarky quotes kept the game visible in community circles.
6. Lia (Small Town, Big Lies)
Portrait: A gossip-prone influencer who prioritises clout over relationships and weaponises secrets for social climbing.
Why she resonates: Lia is a living social media cautionary tale. Players get to test moral boundaries without real-world consequences, and the game’s branching paths make every betrayal feel like an experiment.
Community impact: UK university societies organised tabletop-style playthroughs that mapped Lia’s social graph — perfect fodder for post-game discussions and panels.
7. Hugo (Grief & Gain)
Portrait: A vengeful ex-hero who rationalises cruelty in the name of closure.
Why he resonates: Hugo’s moral contortions are textbook antiheroism — players oscillate between empathy and disgust, which is narratively gripping and makes for viral clip edits highlighting his worst moments.
Community impact: Streamers framed Hugo runs as “redemption or ruin” series, inviting chat to vote on his next terrible choice in real time.
8. Juno (Credits & Revolts)
Portrait: A charismatic instigator who starts protests with performative bravado and throws others under the bus when things get hot.
Why she resonates: Juno’s charisma masks selfishness, making players complicit in rallying for causes that later reveal cracks. That ambiguity fuels discussion about authorial intent and player responsibility.
Community impact: Indie festivals featured debate panels on whether Juno is a revolutionary or a con artist, driving thoughtful coverage and academic interest.
9. Ron (Cleaner Days)
Portrait: A passive-aggressive janitor whose petty sabotage and gatekeeping derail community projects.
Why he resonates: Ron’s small cruelties are the type of interpersonal friction that feels real. Players enjoy dismantling his power in cooperative modes, turning antagonism into team-building.
Community impact: Co-op stream events challenge viewers to “fix Ron’s mess” together, strengthening community bonds and generating recurring content.
10. The Archivist (Memory & Misdeeds)
Portrait: A cold, judgemental keeper of histories who edits the past to suit their narrative.
Why they resonate: In an age where revisionism is a hot topic, an Archivist who weaponises memory forces players to consider who gets to write history — a weighty but compelling evil.
Community impact: Fan projects and mods that restore “lost endings” became a small movement in 2026, proving that antagonists can inspire creative resistance.
Why these characters matter for community, events and esports
In 2026 the indie ecosystem has changed: discoverability increasingly depends on shareable character moments rather than pure mechanics. Flawed protagonists create these moments organically. Here’s how they link to the three pillars of our site:
- Community: Awkward characters spark discussion, empathy and inside jokes that keep communities active long after release.
- Events: They translate easily into panels, cosplay and live improv events — excellent for festivals and community nights.
- Esports & Streams: Though not traditional esports fodder, antiheroes fuel creative competitions (e.g., “play as awful as possible” speedruns, narrative challenges) that stream well and encourage viewer interaction.
2026 trends that amplified the love for terrible protagonists
Several trends from late 2025 into 2026 accelerated the appeal of messy indie protagonists:
- Stream-native design: Indie devs design scenes knowing they’ll be clipped and memed. Characters with strong, awkward beats perform well on short-form platforms.
- AI-assisted NPC complexity: Advances in AI dialogue tools (widely used in 2025–26) let devs craft realistic, contradictory personalities quickly, increasing the depth of flawed characters; see LLM tooling and deployment guides for how studios ship these systems.
- Community-driven content: Players co-create meaning via mods, fanfic and live roleplay, turning characters into long-lived properties beyond the game. Playbooks for micro-events and pop-ups help organisers turn those moments into recurring nights.
- Narrative-events hybridisation: Indie showcases at conventions now include live storytelling events where actors improvise as in-game antiheroes, creating memorable moments that travel online; festival teams are experimenting with hybrid festival formats to monetise those experiences.
Actionable advice
For players: how to get the most from flawed protagonists
- Embrace curiosity: Play opposite your instincts once per save to explore moral branches.
- Clip the cringe: Short clips of awkward beats are the content currency — share the funniest, most human moments to spark discussion. Use short-form clip best practices like the ones in short-form live clip guides.
- Join role events: Look for community-run improv nights or discussion groups at local meetups — these deepen appreciation and make new friends.
For streamers & event organisers
- Design watch parties around “terrible choice” runs — invite chat to vote on the worst option and reduce latency with tips from live stream conversion writing.
- Host panel debates with devs on moral ambiguity and character design — audiences love getting behind-the-scenes context.
- Turn characters into recurring segments (e.g., “Nate Night” where creators attempt the most pathetic acts) to build a steady content series; lightweight streaming rigs and production tips are covered in portable setup reviews like portable streaming rigs.
For indie devs
- Write inconsistent characters intentionally — inconsistency = realism when motivated by clear flaws.
- Include clear moments designed to be streamed or clipped: small embarrassments, snappy bad lines, and choices that provoke reactions.
- Work with communities: early-access players can help iterate dialogue that lands in real conversations. Automating archival workflows and asset grabs (for community-managed clip packs) is covered in developer guides like automating downloads from feeds.
Practical community-building playbook for 2026
Here’s a short playbook you can use whether you run a server, a stream channel or an indie PR campaign:
- Pick the signature beat: identify one awkward or terrible moment that typifies your protagonist.
- Create a clip pack: include 10–20 short clips optimised for social sharing (15–60s).
- Seed micro-events: run weekly “bad-choice” nights where viewers choose the worst move; see micro-event playbooks for running recurring nights.
- Validate with metrics: track clip shares, chat commands used during streams, and attendance at live events.
- Iterate using feedback: use community sentiment to refine dialogue in patches or DLC.
Case study: Baby Steps and the Nate effect
Baby Steps provides a practical example of the model above. Late-2025 buzz emphasised Nate’s pathetic charm; creators leaned into that by clipping fails and hosting “Nate Nights.” Developers Gabe Cuzzillo and Bennett Foddy designed a character that’s easy to parody and hard to forget. The result: strong word-of-mouth, organic stream coverage, and a festival presence — all community-driven outcomes that indie teams can replicate.
Final thoughts — the future of lovable jerks in indie games
In 2026, the indie scene favours authenticity. Players are tired of flat paragons and want protagonists who are a little bit rotten, hilariously human, and endlessly shareable. Whether you’re a player seeking the next awkward obsession, a streamer hunting for fresh content, or a dev aiming to craft a memorable antihero, the playbook is clear: embrace flaws, design for shareability, and lean into community participation.
Call to action
Who did we miss? Tell us your favourite awkward or terrible indie protagonist in the comments, clip your top three cringe moments, and share them on our Discord. If you’re running an event or stream around a flawed protagonist, tag us — we’ll promote the best community-led nights. Follow our coverage for more character studies, event guides and indie matchups through 2026.
Related Reading
- Short-Form Live Clips for Newsrooms: Titles, Thumbnails and Distribution (2026)
- From Micro-App to Production: CI/CD and Governance for LLM-Built Tools — how AI tooling shapes NPCs and dialogue
- Micro‑Events, Pop‑Ups and Resilient Backends: A 2026 Playbook for Creators and Microbrands — turning clip culture into recurring nights
- Live Stream Conversion: Reducing Latency and Improving Viewer Experience for Conversion Events (2026) — tips for interactive streams and viewer voting
- Prefab and Manufactured Homes as Short‑Stay Accommodations: The Rise of Modular Vacation Rentals
- Ticketing Smart: Getting Early Access When Big Platforms Shift Content Strategies
- How to Use Emerging Forum Platforms to Test Video Concepts Before Big Launches
- Create a 'Dark Skies' Breathwork Session: Turning Ominous Emotions into Calm
- Cozy Content Studio Checklist: Lighting, Sound, and Editing Gear Under $1000
Related Topics
newgames
Contributor
Senior editor and content strategist. Writing about technology, design, and the future of digital media. Follow along for deep dives into the industry's moving parts.